Posted by
rightinsight on Friday, June 29, 2007 10:59:53 AM
When George W. Bush nominated Harriet Miers for the Supreme
Court and received the appropriate blowback from conservatives, the corrupt
mainstream media (CMM) said it was the beginning of a conservative crackup. The
CMM’s ideal scenario is always Republicans fighting Republicans. They wanted to
sit back and watch the GOP duke it out over Bush’s pick. If talk radio attacked
the president, so much the better. But Rush Limbaugh correctly labeled the
debate the “conservative crackdown”. And because conservatives stuck to their
principles, we got Sam Alito, one of the most qualified nominees ever for the
high court.
What
happened over the last month with the ill-fated amnesty immigration bill was
Conservative Crackdown II. There is merit to the argument that with only 22% of
the public in support of this bill it was more than conservatives that stopped
it. But realistically, without due diligence from talk radio, greatly assisted
by groups like National Review, the Heritage Foundation, and the bloggers, this
bill would have been rammed through the Senate. Powerful forces were behind
this bill, including almost all business lobbies, immigrant groups, and the
democrat party seeking a new voting block.
The latter
factor prompted fear and intimidation among establishment Republicans. Even
conservative columnists like Bob Novak lamented this as being a “bad issue” for
the GOP. This was it, another conservative crackup. In the aftermath of the
cloture defeat on Thursday the political calculations go forward. I’m dismayed
when I see conservative commentators lamenting that 2008 is over for
Republicans because of this vote. It’s time to set the record straight and
dispel the myths that ran rampant over the last month.
“We have to do
something now!”
Comprehensive immigration reform
had to be done in 2007, or else. Actually, the first statement was true. The
“something” is enforcing the law. Over and over American said they want the
government to show they can enforce the border and other laws long on the
books. This bill fell apart because people no longer trust the government’s
promises. The actions to rush over a thousand pages of legislation through
without committee hearings, and virtually no debate were shameless. The
substance of the bill was never debated. Many details were better discussed on
talk radio than the Senate floor. The truth behind the statement was we have to
legalize these people now because their illegal status makes us look bad and
our big business friends need cheap labor. The most accurate revision of the
statement is “We have to do something first” (prove we can enforce the law).
“Hatred and bigotry
are motivating the opponents of immigration reform”
We always expect the liberals to
play the race card and they did not disappoint. But a Republican president?
Again helpful (?) conservatives like Bob Novak jumped in and made statements
such as “I don’t understand where the hostility is coming from.” The hostility
was coming from millions of informed Americans, but not, for the most part,
aimed at illegal immigrants, but at the government. I used this analogy. When I
hear of a drunk driver who had 10 previous convictions, just killed two people
in an accident, I feel anger. But my anger is not so much at the drunk driver,
but at a system that allowed him to be on the road and did not protect two of
my fellow citizens. I am comparing the logic, not two very different crimes.
“Maybe the motivation
of our government is to help fund social security”
We can only wish these senators
were so shrewd and had fiscally sound motives. The truth is the government
never did any cost/benefit analysis in any area of this bill. We don’t need to
be “smarter by half” to figure out the motivations. Democrats are attempting to
import a voting block and alienate Latinos from Republicans. Republicans are
getting big-time pressure from all business interests to legalize cheap labor.
One of the most revealing statements was made by Arlen Spector who said
senators are not swayed by public opinion. Usually that’s true. Senators are
swayed by special interests and contributions – UNTIL their phone system gets
shutdown.
“It’s a bad issue for
Republicans”
This is a bad issue for everyone
who supported this bill. Only 22% of the public supported this bill. The
telling point of this was the deafening silence coming from the presidential
candidates from the senate over the last two week. This was a McCain/Kennedy
bill. Anyone remember John McCain’s last statement on this bill. I think it may
have been that “F” word confrontation with John Cornyn about three weeks ago,
accompanied by McCain’s plummet in the polls. Anyone heard Hillary and Obama
speak out strongly on this bill in the last two weeks. They just hope nobody
notices their votes. This is why senators do not become president. I think it
will be true again.
So what comes next? Just like
social security which is in bad need of a fix, nothing will happen. It would be
nice if the Senate would live up to its historic reputation, slow down, have
hearings, and craft sound legislation to address the millions of illegal aliens
who are here. However our politicians are cowards who would rather play the
politics against both ends. Thankfully, there are some exceptions. Some stars
in this fight were Jeff Sessions and Jim Demint. Put a presidential ticket
together with these two true conservatives and I would wager them going all the
way on the issues they champion.
The Republican obituaries are being
written by the CMM. Republicans are dead in 2008. I’m so glad I can look back
and see how often they have been wrong. Democrats will continue to exploit this
issue for politics and power. They’ll blame Republicans for “failure” and Bush
will not be exempt. Republicans better be on the offense promoting enforcement
of the law, and strengthening that area, the clear message from the people of
this country. You can always hold your head up and sleep at night if you’ve
done the right thing, but you have to make your case to the public – over and
over again.